Sunday, 29 July 2007

NASA Fusion Jet

The journey time from Earth orbit to Mars could be slashed from six months to less than six weeks if NASA's idea for a nuclear fusion-powered engine takes off.

The space-flight engine is being developed by a team led by Bill Emrich, an engineer at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. He predicts his fusion drive would be able to generate 300 times the thrust of any chemical rocket engine and use only a fraction of its fuel mass.

That means interplanetary missions would no longer need to wait for a "shortest journey" launch window. You can launch when you want.

The principle is to sustain an on-board fusion reaction and fire some of the energy created out the back of the spacecraft, generating thrust. Of course, harnessing fusion is no easy task. Scientists have struggled to contain the super-hot plasmas of charged ions needed for fusion reactions.

Bare nuclei
To achieve fusion, scientists heat the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium to at least 100 million kelvin. This strips electrons from the isotopes, creating a plasma of bare nuclei. If this plasma is hot and dense enough, the two types of nuclei fuse, giving off neutrons and huge amounts of energy.

However, the plasma can only be contained by strong magnetic fields, and creating containment fields that do not leak has proved very difficult. What is more, no one has managed to generate a stable fusion reaction that passes the "break-even" point, where the reaction is generating more energy than it takes to sustain it.

Fortunately for Emrich, the reaction would not need to go far beyond the break-even point to generate thrust. And containment is less of a headache because you actually want some of the plasma to escape, he says. "That's where the thrust comes from."

The problem is 100 million kelvin is not hot enough to generate thrust. At that temperature, the fusion reaction only generates neutrons, which are uncharged and therefore cannot be steered and fired through a magnetic jet nozzle. To produce thrust, you need charged particles.

Bold solution
Emrich is proposing a bold solution. He wants to use microwaves to heat the plasma to 600 million kelvin, triggering a different kind of fusion reaction that generates not neutrons but charged alpha particles - helium nuclei. These can then be fired from a magnetic nozzle to push the craft along.

Emrich has tested the idea with a scaled-down version using an argon plasma. He found that he could get around many of the containment problems by using a long, cylindrical magnetic field with powerful magnets at each end (see graphic).

In a fusion drive, the fields at the end could easily be controlled to release the highly energetic alpha particles and propel the craft.

If fusion researchers can ever achieve stable, break-even fusion, Emrich believes a full-scale fusion drive - perhaps 100 metres long - could be ready and waiting within two decades.

Nuclear fusion could power NASA spacecraft


luciferotto said...

I am not sure if you guys are familiar with Bussard's design for a fusion reactor I would like to suggest that NASA consider becoming involved in the development of this reactor because if successful it could be used on a spacecraft to generate positrons which could be accelerated, using the power produced by the fusion reactor threw a small accelerator and directed out the back of a spacecraft providing propulsion.

Larry Leininger
Mpls Mn

luciferotto said...

I made a mistake in my previous post; positron should be replaced with alpha particles.

danfran said...

inject pairs of silver ions into the containment field

cort said...

This is perfect because I know NASA scientists soon will find the way to travel faster to other planets and galaxies, my question is what would happen when they coming back because they did the travel faster than time we have in the Earth, and how they're going to do without Buy Viagra.

Strive said...

danfran i'm intrigued as to why you demand pairs of silver ions to be injected into the containment field? I'm merely a 17 year old with what i think is a small science background (my own research and 11th grade advanced physics) so go easy if you're still out there.